PENGGUNAAN ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA

Authors

  • Muhammad Anas Thurmudzi
  • Krisnadi Nasution

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58487/akrabjuara.v7i1.1754

Keywords:

Online Dispute Resolution, legal vacuum, special arrangements

Abstract

As technology develops, new breakthroughs emerge which are considered more practical and make it easier for parties to settle business disputes out of court using Online Dispute Resolution. The Online Dispute Resolution method has not yet been regulated, meaning that there is a legal vacuum regarding the use of Online Dispute Resolution. This research is legal research. The approach used to answer this legal issue is the statute approach, which is an approach using legislation and regulations. Conceptual approach (conceptual approach) is used to examine and analyze the framework of thought, conceptual framework or theoretical basis of legal issues to be studied.

Based on the results of the analysis of legal materials, it is concluded that the use of Online Dispute Resolution can be carried out where the Article 4 paragraph (3) of ADR Act stipulates that as long as it has been agreed upon by the disputing parties, dispute resolution through arbitration can occur in the form of electronic documents. Then, according to Article 5 of the ITE Act, it states that electronic information and/or electronic documents and/or their printouts are legal evidence. Even so, Online Dispute Resolution has not been able to run optimally because there are no separate regulations, therefore special arrangements regarding Online Dispute Resolution are needed to ensure legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aziz, Muhammad Faiz, dan Muhamamd Arif Hidayah, “Perlunya Pengaturan Khusus Online Dispute Resolution (Odr) Di Indonesia Untuk Fasilitasi Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9.2 (2020), 275 <https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.449>

Bello, Petrus CKL, “Hubungan Hukum Dan Moralitas Menurut H.L.a Hart,” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 44.3 (2014), 373 <https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol44.no3.27>

Fatahillah, A. Syukur, Mediasi Yudisial Di Indonesia (Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2012)

Gerarita Sitompul, Meline, M Syaifuddin, dan Annalisa Yahanan, “Online Dispute Resolution (Odr): Prospek Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Renaissance, 1.2 (2016), 75–93

Mitendra, Hario Mahar, “Fenomena dalam Kekosongan Hukum,” Jurnal Rechtsvinding Online, April, 2018, 2 <https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/jurnal_online/Fenomena Dalam Kekosongan Hukum.pdf>

Mono, Henny, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Mediasi, (Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2014)

Setiantoro, Arfian, Fayreizha Destika Putri, Anisah Novitarani, dan Rinitami Njatrijani, “Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce Di Era Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 7.1 (2018), 1 <https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v7i1.220>

Soeroso, R, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011)

Suhartono, Slamet, “Hukum Positif Problematik Penerapan Dan Solusi Teoritiknya,” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15.2 (2019), 201–11 <https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i2.2549>

Suyuti, Mustofa Wildan, Kode Etik Hakim (Jakarta: KENCANA PRENADA MEDIA GROP, 2013)

Downloads

Published

2022-02-04

How to Cite

Thurmudzi, M. A., & Nasution, K. (2022). PENGGUNAAN ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA. Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 7(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.58487/akrabjuara.v7i1.1754

Issue

Section

Articles